So here's another set of questions about heartworm treatment where the answer bears repeating. This is a continuation of a dialog that began in a previous post about heartworm treatment. This fellow is out east and has adopted a stray, and unfortunately, the dog has heartworms. At present, he doesn't feel that he can take on the full recommended heartworm treatment with Immiticide to get rid of the adult worms. He has questions about the alternative of just putting the dog on heartworm preventive and trying to "hold the line".
Have you seen young, lightly infected (class 1) dogs overcome a few years of heartworms (maybe
living 2-4 yrs with them and then having no more adult worms due to preventative) and still live decently long lives?
Or is it just ridiculous to think that preventing more adult worms to come and slowly suppressing the ones she has already is okay and not cruel? I worry that just giving her Ivermectin regularly and some doxcycline will be good, but not great, and that years will be taken off her life due to heart damage.
Finally, this is an extremely active dog. She loves to run, jump, and play with our retriever. I
haven't heard her cough or seen her severely out of breath, but it seems this physical activity is not ideal. How much should we cut back? Can she play for a few minutes, or is any exertion just adding more of a chance of heart/artery damage?
Sincerely,
Jason
Hello, Jason,
The experts say that the severity of disease (actual structural damage resulting in decreased function and shortened life, versus just the presence of worms) is due as much or more to a dog's activity level as to the number of worms present.
Unless there are a huge number of worms (as in a dog that has died from the disease, which would be the picture at the top of the post), they really aren't in the heart, but rather in the pulmonary arteries, those vessels coming from the right side of the heart to the lungs (to get oxygen). If the dog is athletic and active, a more turbulent flow of blood is generated in the arteries by the higher blood pressure and more rapid heart rate. This beats up the inside of the arteries by whipping the worms around.
A relatively small number of worms can thus cause more damage in the athletic dog than would a larger number of worms in the couch-potato dog. The couch-potato dog takes it easy, has a slow heart rate, lower blood pressure, and so the worms are just floating lazily in his blood vessels. They aren't getting whipped around.
When the arteries get beat up, they become inflamed, and they swell. The swelling of the walls causes a narrowing of the open space in middle. This restricts blood flow, causing higher blood pressure in the lungs, and creating increased resistance to the heart's effort to pump blood through the vessels. The heart eventually begins to wear out from constant overwork.
The more often, and more vigorously a dog exercises, the more likelihood that even small numbers of worms will eventually cause significant damage. Unfortunately there is no way to say what magic number of worms will be safe, and even if there were, there's no way to count the worms (at least while the dog is alive).
In our area, you can count on an outside dog having some heartworms by the age of one year if he receives no medication. I have seen many dogs who received no heartworm-preventive whatever lead apparently normal lives until the age of 3 to 5 years, having good exercise tolerance and looking great. Then they begin to show outward signs of decreased exercise tolerance, which progresses eventually to congestive heart failure by less than half of a normal life-span.
SO, if your dog is young, healthy, has very few worms, and you keep giving the ivermectin each month so that he doesn't get any additional worms, then yes, she has good odds for a good quality of life for several years. If she were older, or has more worms, then not such good odds.
So, "good odds" of a good life, but no guarantees. What did Dirty Harry say? "Do you feel lucky, punk? Well... do ya?"
It surely would be better to treat the dog for the adult heartworms.
I find this fascinating. That there are worms who target the heart, and not another organ. It's not a very good parasite, because it kills the host.
But, am I wrong in understanding that there is no cure for heartworms-just something that keeps more from developing? Hard to believe with all the advances in science, we can't find something that will kill a simple parasite while not harming the host.
Posted by: Janet | August 25, 2009 at 05:42 AM
Janet,
The Immiticide DOES kill the heartworms and let you start fresh. This guy just didn't think he could spring for the cost. Here's a link to that discussion: http://www.yourpetsbestfriend.com/your_pets_best_friend/2009/05/are-heartworms-getting-worse-a-seminar-part-5-of-6.html
It's a great parasite, because it takes YEARS to kill the host. In the meantime, it reproduces by the zillions.
Thanks for reading and writing.
Posted by: Doc | August 25, 2009 at 10:57 AM
I'm just curious about the damage caused by frequent exercise. That seems just the opposite of what should happen with people, so am I completely misunderstanding what you're saying?
Thanks
Posted by: Margaret | August 29, 2009 at 08:03 AM
Hello, Margaret,
Excercise is beneficial in strengthening muscles, including the heart muscle. This is no different in dogs than in people.
Exercise increases heart rate, and increases blood pressure. In dogs who have foot-long worms in their pulmonary arteries, this creates problems. The more turbulent flow of blood whips the worms harder against the lining of the arteries, and may shove them down tighter into smaller arteries.
This causes inflammation, leading to swelling of the artery wall. This thickening of the artery wall then narrows the opening in the middle, restricting blood flow.
It is much more difficult for the heart to pump the same volume of blood per minute through a tiny opening than through a big opening. Thus the heart becomes overworked, and begins to deteriorate because of that.
I hope this clarifies things.
Thanks for reading and writing.
Posted by: Doc | August 29, 2009 at 10:03 AM
I just adopted a 2year old pit-bull and would like to start giving him preventatives for heart worms. After all that I have learned about these multiplying parasites. I will start giving him Heartguard soon. Thank you for the information. http://www.entirelypets.com/hearplusford.html
Posted by: Davendra | August 29, 2009 at 01:55 PM
Chronic bronchitis involves inflammation and swelling of the lining of the airways that leads to narrowing and obstruction of the airways. The inflammation also stimulates production of mucous (sputum), which can cause further obstruction of the airways. Obstruction of the airways, especially with mucus, increases the likelihood of bacterial lung infections. Chronic bronchitis usually is defined clinically as a daily cough with production of sputum for three months, two years in a row. This definition was developed primarily for research so that like patients could be compared.
Posted by: pulmonary disease | January 13, 2010 at 12:37 PM
I adopted a 4-year German Shepherd/Cattle Dog mix that was heartworm positive (large load). That was back in July 2009. Since then, my dog was given the 3-shot Immiticide protocol: the first shot was administered in July; the last two shots were administed in October within a 24 hour period. Since November 2009, I give my dog Heartgard once a month. And in February 2010, I learned that my dog tested negative for heartworms.
Yesterday, I realized that I forgot to give my dog the March 1 dose for Heartgard. I gave my dog Heartgard as soon as I realized this, but I'm 23 days late.
Will my dog's heartworms come back as a result of my forgetfulness? I'm imagining that some heartworms survived the Immiticide treatment and have taken advantage of my lapse to come back full force.
Thank you in advance!
Posted by: Mike | March 23, 2010 at 10:48 AM
Hello, Mike,
The Heartgard dose has virtually no effect on adult heartworms. Your tested negative in February. If you were to get a positive test result in the near future, it would be from exposure that occurred at least six months previously.
The dose you are late on would only be pertinent to mosquito exposure in the previous five weeks. That was February, so unless you are in the southern hemisphere, you probably didn't have many mosquitoes in February.
Just get back on your regular schedule. You could start giving it on the 23rd from now on, but if the first of the month is what's easy to remember (as it is for most of us), then it won't hurt to give another dose on the first of April. The medicine is out of the dog's system in 24 to 48 hours, so you won't be giving some huge dose (and it wouldn't hurt if the dog DID get a double dose).
Don't sweat it. Just get back with the program.
Good luck.
Posted by: Doc | March 23, 2010 at 05:48 PM
I adore my dogs and try to take care of them, but they started battling taking any pills, even heartworm medicine. Since our immediate area has had a clean record for heartworms for several years, I decided the preventative was not essential. Last year I lost a wonder pomeranian to whip worms. I found out that Interceptor is a preventative for whip worns when one of my other dogs tested positive for heartworms. Our area is no longer clear. We learned a hard lesson, but the precious animals did not deserve to pay for our ignorance. We will begin the treatment in just over a week, and our semi-hyper, 15 pound dachsahuaha will have to be calm and still for 2 months.
Posted by: BJ Jackson | March 31, 2010 at 12:59 PM
I have been rescueing dogs for 20 yrs. I usually treat the hwm pos ones with the immeticide. However, lately I just can not afford it and 2 vets in the area say it is ok to just use the monthly heartgd and eventually they will test neg. How long does this usually take? My dtr's fd wants to adopt a positive dog as a jogging buddy. The pos dog has been on heartgd for 2/3 mos but is this safe?? Thanks - cindy.
Posted by: cindy kuschel | April 27, 2010 at 01:01 PM
Hello, Cindy,
It is safe to give Heartgard to the heartworm positive dogs. It can take two years or more for the dog to clear with just Heartgard. Sometimes it does not work.
In the last few years, we have been trouble with outside dogs getting new heartworm infections, despite taking monthly preventive medicine (whether Heartgard, Interceptor or Revolution). This gives me a lot less confidence in clearing adult worms with Heartgard. This has been a problem mostly in the Mississippi valley, rather than the rest of the country. It starts about 100 miles south of St.Louis and gets worse the farther south that you go.
The level of the dog's activity is very important in determining the amount of damage that heartworms do. They live in the pulmonary arteries, and heavy activity with rapid heart rate and higher blood pressure (aerobic exercise) whips them around the inside of the arteries.
It has been well documented that a "couch potato" with quite a few worms experiences less disease and damage than an athletic dog with a smaller number of worms.
Thus, a heartworm-positive dog as a jogging buddy is not an ideal situation. It would really be better to clear the dog of heartworms before starting strenuous exercise.
If there are very few worms (which is really not possible to quantitatively determine in the live dog), you would probably get by with it.
Someday, though, those worms will die, and float downstream and clog up an artery, and the dog will feel bad. It may not be serious, but then again it might be. This is what happens when you treat with Immiticide. Then, however, you are confining the dog and watching it closely, rather than jogging with it.
I hope this helps to answer your questions.
Good luck.
Posted by: Doc | April 27, 2010 at 01:45 PM
I read somewhere that if you're using the slow kill method, it has to be regular HeartGuard, not HeartGuard Plus. Do you know if that's true, and, if so, why?
Thanks.
Posted by: Deidre Darling | July 08, 2010 at 03:56 AM
Hello, Deidre,
That makes no sense at all. The only difference between the two products is that the Heartguard Plus has Pyrantel pamoate added to it. This drug kills hookworms and roundworms in the intestine. It is a very safe drug -- we use it do deworm 3-week old puppies and kittens.
Thanks for reading and writing.
Posted by: Doc | July 08, 2010 at 07:36 AM
3 days ago I rescued a choc. lab on its way to the pound... He is about 3yrs old and this MOST amazing dog in the world... Today, he tested positive for heart worms. The vet was not very clear on the severity of this case.. but was really wanting to push the fast treatment... He gave me Doxycycline AND Interceptor...in 3months we will start the round of shots... I guess all the research Im doing is making this situation stressful on what I should do..... about 50% articles I have read say DONOT give interceptor to Heartworm positive dogs.... what do you suggest...
Posted by: bucklesfamily | July 12, 2010 at 04:28 PM
Hello, Buckles family,
While the accepted standard is that Heartgard is safer than Interceptor when a dog has microfilariae (microscopic baby heartworms) present in his bloodstream, there are certainly dogs that have no problem with the Interceptor.
If your dog is only showing positive for the adult heartworm protein (an Antigen test or "occult" test), then the Interceptor should be okay.
Heartgard is supposed to be safer if there are babies in the blood.
Ask your veterinarian what the situation is and what his/her viewpoint is on this subject.
If the dog doesn't have any clinical signs of disease, it would be good to wait several months to treat. This is because he has been getting mosquito bites already this summer. The baby heartworms he acquired in the last 5 weeks should be killed by the Interceptor or Heartgard. The ones that were put in before that will be too far along to be killed by the preventive. They won't be susceptible to the Immiticide treatment until they are several months old.
If you were to treat the dog now, you might have a positive test in February, even if he shows completely clear in November. They you would need to treat again to clear the worms that developed from his exposure in May and early June.
Discuss your concerns with your veterinarian.
Good luck.
Posted by: Doc | July 12, 2010 at 08:25 PM
We live on a farm and it was recommended to me to start giving my dogs ivermectin, that it would take care of all internal parasites, I was told by my vet how much to give, all of my dogs seem to have no ill effects, except.. my doberman.. shortly after I gave her ivermectin (I would say about a week) she became lethargic and so pale as to be almost white, I began just treating the symptoms, i.e., chicken liver (cooked) to help with anemia, vit c to help with the absorbtion of iron and very limited activity. 2 weeks into I felt I was loosing her, took her to a different vet, he did bloodtests, exrays and physical exam all to the tune of $346.00 dollars, then came back and said I'm stumped, I don't know whats wrong, the blood tests came back normal except for only a minimal increase in pancreas enzymes. Meanwhile, 2 weeeks after that, she is still grossly pale, no energy at all.. her resting heart rate is very shallow and I'm out of money, so again I am back to battling just the symptoms. What I have read about heartworms is that when they die they can clog the arteries etc, all of which add up to her symptoms, anemia, shallow breathing etc.. my question.. have I killed my dog? she seemed perfectly fine before.. no outward symptoms of heartworms at all, and now this. I am heartbroken but want what is best for her, we are into this a month now and her quality of life is diminished to the point of heartbreaking, sorry for the novel but wanted to give you as much info as possible. your input will be much appreciated. she turned 6 09/10
Posted by: Trish | March 18, 2011 at 06:53 AM
Hello, Trish,
This doesn't sound like ivermectin toxicity. Your general description sounds like s dog who is really anemic, which the blood tests should have shown.
This is not typical of heartworm disease. Post-caval heartworm syndrome can make them super sick, super fast. Usually they have hemolysis (rupturing of the red blood cells) which makes them anemic and their urine dark, and eventually they get yellow mucus membranes - gums, whites of the eyes, etc.
Sometimes dogs with spleen tumors will have internal bleeding episodes and look like this.
I wish that I could give you some helpful information or suggestions, but long-distance diagnosis is just a little too tricky in a situation like this.
Best wishes.
Posted by: Doc | March 18, 2011 at 08:49 PM
Four years ago my adopted heeler mix was heartworm positive and my vet wanted me to give him the fast kill method. I was told it would cost around $2000 for the total treatment, and short of taking out a loan, this was not an option for me financially. I went to a second vet who told me about the Heartgard method. I decided since he was in stage one, very healthy, young, and only had a "weak positive" for heartworms to go with giving him heartgard.
I didn't restrict his activity because my vet didn't mention it would be risky and he came through it just fine. A year later he was heartworm negative and he is a very happy, healthy and active 5 year old dog now! I just took him to my vet who was very interested in the treatment I chose and did some extra blood work on him. All his tests came back great and the vet said he is a very healthy dog. I think evidence will continue to mount for using Heartgard to treat mild cases, especially if you are worried about the cost of treatment.
Posted by: Rocco | April 04, 2011 at 09:04 AM
Hello, Rocco,
I am glad that you had such a good experience. My own results have not been nearly so good with the "soft kill" method. Dogs have remained positive three years out in some cases.
The American Heartworm Society officially withdrew its approval/recommendation of the procedure this year.
I am glad that it worked well for you, but overall we are really losing confidence in getting good results.
I cannot imagine a place where they charge $2,000 for heartworm treatment. That's about four times what we charge. You must be in Beverly Hills or someplace where practice overhead expenses are through the roof.
Posted by: Doc | April 04, 2011 at 10:46 AM
My 18 month rescue lab tested negative for heartworm in Feb 2011. We got him in March and unfortunately did not continue to give him the heartworm preventative (we live in NY and honestly were never expressly encouraged/educated about giving it).
So, six months later we brought him to the vet and were horrified to hear that he tested positive.
The vet is treating him with Worm Shield (ivermectin / pyrantel) once a month, Doxycycline (300mg/day)for a few weeks and Prednazone 30 mg 2x a day, which will be tapered down.
Injections were discussed but she wants to start treating him first with this method and may give injections in the future.
I am freaking out about this! The only consolation is that he probably got bitten before we got him and had the "false negative" test because there was no antigen present 6 months ago. Am I right? He came from South Carolina.
Luckily, he is showing no symptoms. Unfortunately he is an active dog...we, of course, have limited this!
Can you please give your thoughts on this treatment??
Posted by: Donna | September 17, 2011 at 07:15 AM
Hello, Donna,
Your veterinarian is doing exactly what I would be doing, and following the best recommendations of the American Heartworm Society.
We hope that Immiticide (the drug that actually kills the heartworms) will become available again soon, but right now you cannot get it.
Even if your doctor had a ton of the Immiticide, many veterinarians (myself included) pre-treat for one month with doxycycline to make the worms smaller and weaker.
You can search the blog for the post on doxcycline.
It sounds to me like you are in good hands.
Good luck, and thanks for reading and writing.
Posted by: Doc | September 17, 2011 at 11:13 AM
On March 22, my St. Bernard (4 yrs) and my Boston Terrior (8 yrs old) tested positive for heartworm. It is all my fault since they are mostly house dogs I didn't think I needed to worry about mosquitoes. I was horribly wrong. We live in Tennessee. My vet only mentioned one treatment - the fast kill. St. Bernard's Immiticide treatment will cost $780 and my Boston will cost $440. After researching all day I've read up on the slow-kill method which is more in my price range.
If I decide on the Heartguard/doxy/prednizone method will the adult worms continue to live? Will this only kill the young ones? What happens to the adult ones? How do any of them finally get out of their body? Stool? Cough up? If they do cough them up in a crate - couldn't they eat them?
My St. Bernard, who has always been gentle, very uncharacteristically attacked my brother a couple of weeks ago and drew blood. I could have killed him that day. Yesterday was the first time I had to tell a child that she couldn't pet him and it about broke my heart. I just don't trust him now. Which also adds to my confusion as to what to do regarding treatment.
Both dogs like to lay around, the St. moreso than the Boston, but I can keep both in small areas.
I just want someone to tell me what to do! Or help me decide. I've read all the questions and your answers on this site about this. If Immiticide wasn't available, what would I do exactly for the slow kill and what can I expect 1 -2 -3 years from now.
Posted by: Tracy Powers | March 23, 2013 at 05:51 PM
Hello, Tracy,
The so-called "Slow kill" or "soft kill" method is really a not much of any kill at all method. It is unreliable. It should keep you from getting any more worms than you already have. It iwll be years before the worms die of old age, or maybe a little sooner with the medicine.
This had a bigger following before we ran into the problems with apparent lack of efficacy in even preventing heartworms, much less curing them.
When the worms die, they shift position, being carried downstream in the pulmonary arteries until they reach one too small to pass through. They lodge there, blocking it partially or completely. This blockage of the artery is where the risk factor comes in. You've heard you shouldn't get an air bubble injected -- a 12 inch worm is worse.
The worms do not pass out of the body. Instead, the white blood cells (too tiny to be seen without a microscope) have to eat them. This takes four to six weeks to get the blockage dissolved and the arteries opend.
When you treat with Immiticide, you know when this mess will be happening. With long-term Heartgard use, you have no idea when this will occur.
Ideally you would keep the dog's activity restricted during the period when the worms are being dissolved. Can you do this for years? Not really.
Signs that you may see with the worms blocking the arteries include coughing, difficult breathing, loss of appetite, fever, coughing up blood, or just generally feeling bad.
The treatment is nto the greatest. No matter how few worms and how careful we are, there is always the chance of some complications. However, most dogs do well when treated in monthly stages -- pre-treatment with doxycycline, then a half treatment with Immiticide, then the full treatment with two days of Immiticide. In our practice we start the dogs on prednisone at the time of the Immiticide injections. This helps minimize the inflammatory reactions in the pulmonary arteries when the worms move.
I wish this were simple and easy, but it's not.
Posted by: Doc | March 23, 2013 at 06:50 PM