After my last post, one reader asked me if I would post the questions and answers. I replied (pretty much without thinking) that they are posted as comments on the original post. So how would you know where to look, gentle reader? I'm going to start posting the ones that have more general interest. I'm taking more time to write some of them than I do to write a regular blog entry. This one, for instance, popped up as a comment on "Problems with Heartworm Treatment".
The Question:
I have enjoyed reading your thoughtful responses to so many questions. Here is mine asked with much respect.
What are your thoughts on the "slow kill" method? A rescue I foster for
recommends Doxy for a month (although I found a study that suggests 2 weeks
is better) then Ivermectin every 2 weeks for up to a year until a negative result [blood test free of heartworms]
is met. The reasons are primarily to make the treatment less harsh and of
course financial [less dollars].
My second question is what Heartworm treatment is recommended for a lethal white [gene]
Aussie with heartworms. I believe they are in the Collie family and cannot have ivermectin.
My Answer:
The doxycycline is intended to kill a microorganism called Wohlbachia that infests the heartworm itself. Many researchers believe that a great deal of the reaction we see to the breakup of the dead worms is related to the presence of this organism. The doxycyline pre-treatment is not a universally adopted practice, but is inexpensive and does no harm (unless the delay allows more heart and artery disease to develop in dogs who have clinical signs of disease, versus just a "positive blood test").
Even when the Wohlbachia is gone, you still have chunks of dead worm to deal with, and they WILL cause inflammation in the pulmonary arteries. The inflammation causes swelling of the blood vessel, which restricts its inner opening. This makes circulation in the lung tissue poor, and increases the pressure on the compromised artery, and increases the back-pressure the hear must pump against.
This brings us to your question about using long-term ivermectin to kill the worms, and whether this is somehow "less harsh". Dead worms are dead worms, no matter what kills them. When they die and drift downstream, it doesn't matter what drug killed them or how long it took. They will still lodge and plug things up and cause inflammation.
With the dramatic increase in the number of dogs who get small numbers of heartworms despite taking monthly ivermectin (Heartgard 30, etc.) I have serious doubts that taking ivermectin every two weeks is going to kill the heartworms. Previous studies documenting this noted that it took as long as two years for the worms to die with this treatment (with no treatment at all, the worms would die of old age in about four years). These studies were made before we began to see the apparent failure of the drug to prevent heartworms 100% (in the past 3 years). Since they are getting new worms while taking the ivermectin, it's hard for me to have confidence in the drug getting rid of the old ones.
Even if we accept that giving ivermectin twice monthly would eventually kill the heartworms (and I am not confident of this), we have to ask if this is really a good thing. When we give the standard treatment of the Immiticide injections, we know that the worms will die within the next few days. Thus we are alert for signs of complications. We also are now giving the dogs prednisone after their treatment in order to minimize the inflammation experienced when the dead worms move.
The bottom line is that we know when the worms will be dying and moving, so we can be on the alert and detect complications rapidly, and deal with them. We know that the dog's activity should be restricted while the dead worms are clogging up the works, and we can do this for the next five or six weeks.
If the worms were going to die at some unspecified time in the indefinite future, how in the dickens are you going to be on constant "red alert" for the next two years? Are you going to crate the dog for two years? Give him prednisone for two years? I submit that you will not be doing any of these things. Therefore, when the worms DO die, you are more likely to experience complications.
Since complications are related to how many dead worms are breaking up and hitting the smaller pulmonary arteries, it would make sense that the dog would do better if the worms died one at a time over a long period of time. There is NO evidence to say that this is what happens with the ivermectin (if indeed, anything is happening with the ivermectin). Even if you could prove that "in six months, the worms began to die one at a time, regular as clockwork, one-tenth of the worms per month for ten months" (and this is absurd), would you crate the dog for ten months, starting six months from now?
The sad fact of the business is that the Immiticide treatment is the only thing that we know is effective. We can reduce the risk by giving a half-treatment, and then waiting a month to give the full treatment. This also makes it more likely that ALL of the worms will be killed. (Unfortunately, there is no such thing as 100%, "always" or "never" when we're talking about this).
This (Immiticide treatment) would be the appropriate treatment for the Aussie. While they cannot tolerate high doses of ivermectin, they tolerate the preventive dose in Heartgard 30. You could certainly use Interceptor as your preventive instead, but it's not going to be effective in ridding the dog of adult heartworms.
It is certainly cheaper to give Ivermectin twice monthly for years than to do the Immiticide treatment. On the other hand, giving nothing is even cheaper. Doesn't work, but it's cheap.
Sorry that I don't have a quick fix for you.
Thanks for reading and writing,
Everett Mobley, D.V.M.
Dr. Mobley, since you stated this:
With the dramatic increase in the number of dogs who get small numbers of heartworms despite taking monthly ivermectin(Heartgard 30, etc.)
Are you recommending something other than Heartgard for your patients? Have you seen an increase in the number of dogs infected while on Interceptor?
I remember you writing on your blog previously about dogs on preventative becoming infected and I asked my vet at my dog's yearly checkup and she said she hasn't heard of that happening in my area. Is this becoming more widespread across the country?
Posted by: Lynda | April 12, 2009 at 02:28 PM
Hello, Linda,
This problem appears to be mainly in the Mississippi valley region, south of Jackson, Missouri. The farther south you go, the worse it is. It does not appear to be a problem in other mosquito infested areas, other coastal areas, lake areas, etc.
The reason for this is unclear, though several explanations have been proposed, most notably more tropical storms in the Gulf, leading to more flooding, leading to more mosquitoes, leading to more heartworms.
It is difficult to accept this explanation when you live in the Mississippi Delta on reclaimed swampland where rice is farmed. We have always had and continue to have a jillion mosquitoes.
As to Heartgard versus Interceptor, the percentage of failure rate is about the same with all three drugs that we use: ivermectin (Heartgard-30), milbemycin oxime (Interceptor and Sentinel), and selamectin (Revolution). Other drugs and products on the market are related compounds: avermectins.
If I found a preventive that was clearly better, you can bet I would be switching everyone to it. Unfortunately, this is not the case. No new drugs in the pipeline, either.
I'm attending another seminar on this on April 21st, and will post afterward.
Thanks for reading and writing.
Posted by: Doc | April 12, 2009 at 06:53 PM
I'll check back to see what you learn at your seminar. I give my three dogs Heartguard. I certainly want to protect them from heartworms and would like to know the best way to do that.
Posted by: kathleen | April 15, 2009 at 05:06 AM
Hi, Great site and a lot of useful information
Posted by: Cat Products | May 03, 2009 at 05:57 AM
Have 2 labs both tested positive to heartworms.
1-lab vet treated, new blood work still positive.
2- lab pulling more blood work and sending to different lab. Interceptor given first of month always.
Interceptor gives us year supplies due to dogs being treated and still contacting heartworms.
Are other people having this problem with dogs.
Posted by: Twila | July 29, 2009 at 12:20 PM
Check the series of six posts beginning with "Are Heartworms getting worse?"
http://www.yourpetsbestfriend.com/your_pets_best_friend/2009/05/are-heartworms-getting-worse-a-seminar-part-1-of-6.html
Posted by: Doc | July 29, 2009 at 04:47 PM
Dear Dr. Mobley,
I found your blog through google and was very impressed. I have a few brief questions and I'd greatly appreciate your thoughts.
Recently my wife and I found a Pit Bull mixed dog in our neighborhood. We tried like crazy to find the owners, but had no luck. We are not willing to see the dog put to sleep, and thus she is now ours. I took her to our vet yesterday and he told us she had heartworms (Spot Test) and that treatment is extremely likely to be successful (assuming class 1). I knew little about heartworms at the time, and thus asked just simple questions. I'll see him in two weeks, but after some research, I have many thoughts and few answers.
We are not wealthy by any means. She is young and has no cough nor breathing troubles after activity. Your article on the "slow kill" treatment was pretty scathing, but in this case does it at least seem reasonable? I was thinking weekly ivermectin with regular doxcycline for 6 months. My hope is that the adult heartworms' lives will shortened, the extended time span of treatment will only result in limited cardiac damage, and that embolism problems will be minimal.
Also, some vet sites mention that ivermectin based preventative products are better for dogs w/ heartworms than milbemycin products, due to the milbemycin's rapid killing of the larvae. Do you agree? Some also mention that ivermectin products are more effective on shortening adult heartworms lives. I'm confused and not sure what is true and what is just internet recklessness. Regardless of whether we treat with immiticide or try the "slow kill," it seems the dog needs to be on some preventive heartworm pill to make sure new larvae heartworms are forming.
I'm sure you're busy, but hopefully you'll have a chance to offer your assistance. Thank you
Posted by: Jason | August 21, 2009 at 09:40 PM
That Heartworm disease can affect people o chemotherapy ?
Posted by: Viagra Online | September 24, 2009 at 06:42 AM
Hello,
Heartworm disease does not generally affect people in any way, other than how they feel about their dogs.
The heartworm larvae enter people all the time via mosquito bites, but they rarely live and leave the spot where they enter. There are rare reports of finding an adult heartworm in a person's abdominal cavity, or some other weird location.
Sometimes the migrating microscopic baby heartworm will reach the lungs, and the body forms a little knot around it. This can show up on a chest X-ray, leading to a lung biopsy to find out whether you have TB or cancer or what.
Generally speaking heartworms do not affect people.
Posted by: Doc | September 24, 2009 at 11:07 AM
what if I miss a pill for heartworms.
Posted by: dolores Hein | September 25, 2009 at 05:47 PM
Hello, Dolores,
You should give the pill as soon as you realize that you missed one. Do not stop giving the pills in a situation like this.
If the dog has had mosquito exposure during this time, then it may possibly develop heartworms. You will not be able to detect this with a blood test until at least six months after the missed pill.
So, get back on schedule, keep giving the pills, and get a blood test in six months.
Thanks for reading and writing.
Posted by: Doc | September 26, 2009 at 09:12 AM
Thanks for writing
Posted by: purchase viagra canadian | November 04, 2009 at 11:14 PM
To ensure that your dog is free from heartworm parasites, preventive medication should be given especially in the early months of the dog to avoid such problem on the dog’s health the same applies on the cats.Visit http://dogs-corner.blogspot.com/2009/09/dealing-with-your-dog-heartworm.html
Posted by: catherine | November 24, 2009 at 05:45 AM
Hi Doc!
I see you told Dolores to if one if I misses a pill for heartworms..that they should give the pill as soon as you realize that you missed one...now I was wondering once you give the missed pill to your dog..do you give him the rest of the pills counting from when you actually gave him the missed pill or do you keep counting form when you were suppose to have given him that pill..hope this makes sense :) ?!
Posted by: Roberto | December 21, 2009 at 02:52 AM
Hello, Roberto,
You could start counting 30 days or four weeks or one month from the time that you finally remember to give the pill.
For most people (like me), if I am late giving it on the first of the month, I probably will do worse trying to do it on the seventh the next month or the fifteen the next month. I'm afraid I would just be worse about forgetting.
I recommend setting a date that's easy to remember, like the first, or when you pay the rent, or payday or something.
The medicine is really safe. Thus, if you were two weeks late one month, giving it on the fifteenth instead of the first, it would be perfectly safe to give it on the first of the next month. Two weeks apart is no problem. Two DAYS apart would be safe, as far as that goes.
Thanks for reading and writing.
Posted by: Doc | December 21, 2009 at 03:38 PM
Hi all! I like the post like this. It is really interesting for me.
Posted by: uk online casinos | December 23, 2009 at 07:05 AM
Hey Doc
I was giving my dogs their monthly heartworm medicine. I had already fed my 8 month old puppy, Panda, and when I was taking the heartworm out for my 2 1/2 old dog, Bear, Panda ate it! I was wondering if anything bad would happen to her after eating 2 heartworms.
Thanks for your time.
Posted by: Mychol | January 02, 2010 at 01:23 PM
Hello, Mike,
The medicine is super safe. The active drug ingredient is present in very small amounts. While I wouldn't recommend it on a routine basis, she could probably eat a handful of monthly doses with no ill effects.
Not to worry.
Posted by: Doc | January 04, 2010 at 03:16 PM
Hey doc, I use baytril as antibiotic for my pets. can you suggest me some thing on this med.
Posted by: karjat plot | March 31, 2010 at 09:48 AM
Hello, Karjat Plot,
I'm not sure I understand your question. Baytril is the trade-name for enrofloxacin, a fluoroquinolone antibiotic.
When it was first approved, the dosage was recommended to be split twice daily. This is still on the label. However, it now appears that this class of drugs is more effective when the total daily dose is given once daily.
It is important not to exceed a daily dose of 5mg/kg/day in cats, as this can cause damage to the retina in the eye, resulting in blindness.
I don't use Baytril for "every day" infections, reserving it for tougher germs. Over-use of the drug will result in resistant bacteria, and reduced usefulness of the drug.
I really cannot advise you on dosing your pets, as I have not examined them.
Thanks for reading and writing.
Posted by: Doc | March 31, 2010 at 10:13 AM
Surgical removal of the adult heartworms is also a treatment that may be indicated, especially in advanced cases with substantial heart involvement
Posted by: | July 20, 2010 at 11:25 PM
This treatment is usually reserved for dogs with post-caval syndrome. This is where the worms locate themselves in the large veins returning blood to the heart, usually the posterior vena cava. This results in a very rapid deterioration of the dog's condition. Red blood cells are cut like putting them through a sieve. The liver circulation is badly disturbed. They rapidly become anemic and icteric (jaundiced). They are unresponsive (usually) to any palliative medical therapy.
Inserting a long forceps from the jugular vein in the dog's neck down to heart level allows attempts at removal of these worms. You are plucking them out blindly (you hope).
There will still be worms remaining in the heart, and in the pulmonary arteries, but (if successful) you can buy the dog some time for conventional treatment.
The procedure's success rate varies considerably between surgeons. Some do well,others have abandoned the procedure. It is certainly not without risk, but these dogs have little alternative.
Posted by: Doc | July 21, 2010 at 05:54 PM
What are the chances that a dog who is on a heartworm preventative and been heartworm free for 4 years (their whole life) can catch heartworms from a dog in the home who has been treated with the "fast kill" for heartworms?
Posted by: Ashley | August 24, 2010 at 06:28 PM
Hello, Ashley,
Having the heartworm-infected dog in the home does not really raise the risk of infection for the dog on preventive medicine.
The overall level of mosquito exposure is a much greater factor. There are plenty of infected and untreated-hosts in the environment elsewhere.
Sometimes our preventive medicines are not 100% effective, but even "preventive failure" cases have had MOST of the worm infection prevented.
I really would not be a bit more worried about having the other dog in the house.
Thanks for reading and writing.
Posted by: Doc | August 25, 2010 at 10:07 AM
I took a small rescue dog in to foster a month ago. When I had her spayed, she had severe complications post-op, but stabilized and pulled through with IVs. The vet ran a HW test and she came up positive (and in retrospect, I have noticed some occasional coughing/gagging previously, but nothing else). The surgery has been 2 weeks ago and the dog is doing well and is happy again. I will probably opt for the immiticide/doxycycline treatment, but am very worried about being able to keep the dog quiet, as I have many animals in and around the house running around and this little dog is a terrier mix with a high excitement and activity level. What is also a grave concern, is my working very long hours and thus being gone sometimes 12 hours or more (I live alone and in the country without anyone being able to check on the dog while I'm gone), so if complications arose I most likely would not be around to catch it on time! Taking off work unfortunately is not an option since I am on a very tight budget and can't afford the loss in income (the dog's treatment is even being financed through donations). Would it be feasable to keep the dog tranquilized to keep her quiet while going through treatment (split-dose)? Is there anything else I can do to greatly reduce the chance of embolisms, so as not to have to worry myself sick for the 2 month of treatment when I'm at work?
Posted by: Eva | May 08, 2011 at 05:12 PM
Hello, Eva,
There is a product made by Vetriscience that is called Composure, available in liquid or chewy treats. It is a supplement, rather than a drug that really helps calm a lot of dogs. It doesn't always work wonders, but in some dogs it DOES.
Low doses of the antihistamine Benadryl are pretty harmless and make most dogs a little drowsy. In more extreme situations, tranquilizers can be used.
Sometimes we have to just keep the dog in a crate, or in a puppy play-pen.
If she is in the house, she is not nearly as likely to produce those complications of exercise as she would running outside.
I would bet that you will do fine.
Good luck.
Posted by: Doc | May 09, 2011 at 10:24 AM
Hi Doc,
Thank you for such an informative site. It has provided me with alot of comfort.
I rescued a pound dog 3 weeks ago, HW +. On 5/2 he began Immeticide x 2, 24 hours apart. He was originally asymptomatic, with right heart enlargement thus rated a borderline class 2.
He is approx 7 yrs old, 30 lbs, lab/basset ?????
Question: he has had approx 3 episodes of labored breathing lasting about 10 min each on different days. Took him to the Emergency vet first time and it had resolved by the time we arrived so it was chalked up as possible "pain". He has tolerated the discomfort and I have not treated.(Rimadyl was dispensed) All occurred at rest (no anxiety/activity trigger) No cough, no fever, lungs were clear, gums remained pink. It is now day 7 post treatment. He has been activity restricted to the living room area only, leash to potty only. (He refuses the crate)He eats, drinks, potty's etc. Unfortunately he has separation anxiety issues when I go to work which scares me to death. Me only household.
We had an episode this morning- same thing, upon waking. Resolved spontaneously. I am awaiting a return call from my vet.
I try not to be a "nervous nellie" ( I am an ICU RN )
I know the worms are dying and shifting, but is this something that I should expect for awhile or do you think steroids should be added-- are they added routinely? Do they act preventatively against embolism? Thanks very much for your time and for this site.
Oh, and again I have contacted my vet..and waiting.
C
Posted by: Christine | May 10, 2011 at 09:18 AM
Hello, Christine,
We now start prednisone (steroids) at time of treatment. I used to wait to start them until the dog showed signs of distress.
You and your veterinarian will just have to work together on this. Not knowing all the details, it's hard for me to advise you.
Generally speaking, I think I would be starting this dog on steroids now. You can't give Rimadyl and steroids together, though.
Steroids minimize the inflammatory reaction in the pulmonary arteries, so that they don't constrict down around the worm fragments, which would aggravate the restriction of blood flow and increase pressure. The rimadyl won't really do that.
Good luck.
Posted by: Doc | May 10, 2011 at 10:13 AM
Nice Information.
Posted by: Mau | May 16, 2011 at 05:28 AM
Hello. I rescued a HW+ dog (14 lbs pom mix) from the Dallas Animal Shelter. He was not up for adoption due to being HW+ and was schedule to be euthanized. I had heard about the shortage of HW treatment meds but also heard about the slow kill method and thought I would give it a try. He just took his last weekly dose of Heartguard. A day after, he started couching/gaging several times a day, then more frequent a few days later. Is this normal? It sounds like a asthma attach.
Posted by: Cindy | October 23, 2011 at 12:16 PM
Hello, Cindy,
Without chest X-rays it's hard to tell if your dog's coughing problems are related to the presence of heartworms or not. Pomeranians often have trouble with weak airways, even collapse of their trachea (windpipe). This can certainly cause respiratory distress.
Until Immiticide (the heartworm treatment drug) becomes available again, we are treating these dogs by giving doxycycline for one month, as well as putting them on Heartgard. This is unlikely to kill any heartworms, but should keep them weaker, and smaller, and stop them from producing babies in the blood.
With the history you have given, I would suggest contacting your veterinarian for an exam (and probably X-rays) to see if there is heart enlargement, pulmonary artery enlargement, lung problems, or airway problems.
Thanks for reading and writing.
Posted by: Doc | October 23, 2011 at 05:03 PM